Fedaralism-Judicial Review
by Unknown
"Judges
have five sources of guidance for interpreting the Constitution: the original
intention of the founders" says the writer and that "arguments
based on the theory of the Constitution; arguments based on the Constitution's
structure; arguments based on judicial precedent; and arguments based on moral,
social, and political values." he/she says
that "Across
the centuries, several justices have attempted to interpret the original, often
vague intention of a document written in the late 1700s." and therefore the court may not have full understanding of what the priniples of the review.
Federalism Today
|
In the contemporary world federalism as a political idea has become increasingly important as a way of peacefully reconciling unity and diversity within a political system."Modern developments in transportation, social communications, technology, and industrial organization have produced simultaneous pressures not only for larger states but also for smaller ones." so the us been forced to " develope two powerful, thoroughly interdependent, yet distinct and often actually opposed motives: the desire to build an efficient and dynamic modern state, and the search for distinctive identity."
|
Judicial Review
|